Day: July 1, 2024

Singapore Prize Winners Announced

Earthshot Prize 2018 winners were revealed during an extravagant ceremony in Singapore. Prince William of Britain, whose foundation initiated this 10-year award program in 2020, attended wearing a dark green velour suit and dickie bow. Co-host Hannah Waddingham (49), donned a sparkling black ball gown adorned with long green sashes that coordinated perfectly with their thick green carpet walk. Amongst the winners of this year’s Earthshot Prize included Indian manufacturer of solar dryers; soil carbon marketplace; groups working towards making electric car batteries cleaner; Andean forests restoration and deterring illegal fishing activity among others. Those taking home the top prize were rewarded with $2158 cash and custom designed trophy as prizes!

This inaugural prize, created in 2014 by the National University of Singapore’s history department and established with international entries being welcome, recognizes Singaporean history from an international perspective. According to prize creator Kishore Mahbubani – professor at NUS and one of its history faculty – “a healthy civil society requires citizens who can use shared memories from our shared past as resources when making important choices during pivotal moments”.

This year’s shortlist covers an impressive breadth of topics, from Singapore’s history of modernization efforts to how the coronavirus pandemic affected daily life in Singapore. Of particular note is its age diversity – two winners this year — Malay writer Suratman Markesan’s Honing the Pen, Volume 2 and Wang Gungwu’s Home Is Where We Are Going) — are both 91 years old — making them two of the prize’s oldest winners ever!

In October at the World Architecture Festival (WAF) in Singapore, the 2021 winner will be revealed. For six consecutive years now, WAF has collaborated with Inside World Festival of Interiors to recognize and honour international proposals that leverage cutting-edge design while meeting global challenges. In addition, for the first time ever WAF will present special awards including Best Use of Natural Light supported by VELUX; Best use of Stone supported by Turkish Stone; and The Sustainability Prize supported by Rockwool.

“. ” |

This award recognizes outstanding institutions and individuals that demonstrate leadership through innovation, excellence, integrity and social responsibility. Institutions, organisations or individuals that have made substantial contributions to Singapore’s economic expansion and people wellbeing will receive this honour. This award is an initiative undertaken jointly by Singapore’s Ministry of Trade and Industry, Economic Development Board, National Research Council and Civil Service Commission as an incentive for Singaporeans to continue contributing towards world prosperity. As well as honouring pioneers who have served our country with distinction, this award will serve to motivate others to follow in their footsteps and emulate them. A trophy bearing “Singapore: The Story of Our Nation” on one side and the Civil Service Commission logo on the other will be presented at this ceremony.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Lottery

The Lottery is a form of gambling where numbers are drawn randomly to determine a winner, popular in the United States and contributing billions annually to state coffers. Although playing the Lottery may have some advantages, its drawbacks should not be overlooked; low odds of winning, potential for addiction and its negative regressive impact on lower income groups are all considerations when engaging in lottery. Furthermore, playing can be expensive without necessarily leading to financial security – it is therefore wise to carefully weigh these considerations before participating in one.

Lotteries provide two key advantages of playing lottery: fast money distribution and optimism-inducing participation – especially useful for individuals experiencing financial hardship. Furthermore, purchasing tickets may help people feel social responsibility which may alleviate feelings of guilt and shame brought on by financial crises.

Lotteries provide entertainment to players and spectators alike, providing thrills from the anticipation of winning and socialization among community members alike. Furthermore, lottery is an effective way of funding public projects.

Though many view the modern Lottery with favor, some critics have voiced concerns regarding its operation. Critics have raised issues of compulsive gamblers and its potentially regressive effects on lower income groups; nonetheless, debate continues as researchers and politicians study its influence on society.

Modern lottery advocates typically cite its benefits as a source of “painless” revenue generated through player purchases voluntarily made, especially during periods of economic distress, when there are worries of tax hikes and program reduction. Yet studies show that Lotterie popularity does not correlate to states’ actual fiscal health.

There is something very soothing and reassuring in knowing you can rely on someone, wherever they may be in life. Lotteries also attract an extensive group of specific constituencies, including convenience store owners who benefit from selling tickets; lottery product suppliers (whose heavy donations to state political campaigns have often been reported); teachers in states that allocate Lottery revenues towards education; and state legislators who become used to having an additional source of revenue. Though many Americans dislike state-run lotteries, despite strong disapproval they continue to play large numbers. This suggests powerful motivations underpinning this behavior that endure despite ads condemning Lotteries. No one really understands why so many people keep playing the lottery when its odds are so dismal, but new research indicates that people may be drawn in by two key messages from Lottery sponsors that encourage participation in Lotterie games. First is the myth that winning lottery tickets is fun – which largely masks how much people spend and how little they win in return. Second is the idea that lottery players are performing an essential service by supporting their state – yet again veiling over its regressive contribution to overall state revenue.